What should you primarily consider regarding the purpose and objectivity of a research resource?

When evaluating a research resource, considering the underlying motives of the author is crucial. Authors might have specific agendas or perspectives that can influence how they present information, interpret findings, or draw conclusions. Understanding these motives helps assess whether the research can be considered objective and reliable.

For example, if an author is affiliated with a particular organization that stands to benefit from certain outcomes, their portrayal of data might skew towards promoting that organization's interests. This scrutiny can lead to better discernment of the trustworthiness of the information, ensuring that you are relying on research that genuinely aims to provide unbiased insights.

Recognizing the importance of authorial motives can help you identify potential conflicts of interest, which is vital for making well-informed decisions based on the research. While other aspects such as funding sources and biases in data interpretation play important roles in evaluating research, the author's motives often provide the foundational understanding required to assess credibility and objectivity.